Is Bayleigh on Bb20 Pregnant Again
(Natural News) A shocking new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given covid vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of v unborn babies.
This stunning finding, explained below, is cocky-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, "Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons." Merely as agonizing as the information is the fact that the report authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth almost vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.
Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our ain science contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to ostend two things:
- Yes, the written report shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given covid vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
- Yeah, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with quack obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to effort to claim vaccinating meaning women is perfectly prophylactic. Merely the study data really testify quite the oppose.
Here's how:
700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester
Tabular array 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 meaning women were studied. Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their offset vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or 2nd trimesters. (You accept to read the fine print below the table to see this disclosure.)
Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or 2nd trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as "spontaneous abortions" in the tabular array.
In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the showtime 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their kickoff or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions amid these pregnant women who were vaccinated.
It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as "stillbirths" and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have peradventure occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.
Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their "spontaneous abortions" calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or 2d trimesters.
Put another style, it is impossible for a adult female who was vaccinated for the commencement time during her third trimester to have a "spontaneous abortion" in the kickoff 20 weeks, since they weren't vaccinated during the outset twenty weeks (and pregnant women aren't time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn't be included in the denominator used to summate the spontaneous ballgame charge per unit.
The authors of this study should receive an accolade in the category of, "How to lie with statistics," because they evidently tried to pull a sleight-of-paw play tricks to brand it appear that vaccines are safe for meaning women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than four out of five unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set up. (It's a small-scale fix of 127 pregnant women, so we'd like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in social club to get a more than clear flick.)
Apples and oranges, lemons and limes
A simple way to explain this with a metaphor is to imagine a bag of 50 lemons and 50 limes, with a science study asking the question, "What pct of lemons are yellow?" The scientists count all the yellow fruit and reach the number 50. They mistakenly divide 50 into 100 because in that location are 100 full slice of fruit, and then they declare, "fifty% of lemons are yellow" considering information technology's 50/100.
Merely the other 50 pieces of fruit tin't perhaps be included because they're limes, non lemons. And so the correct math is fifty/fifty, which means 100% of the lemons are yellow. That'southward the correct answer.
In this science paper, they are using 827 as the denominator, even when 700 out of those 827 women were only vaccinated in the third trimester, which is long past the time window during which a "spontaneous abortion" can occur. And since significant women aren't time travelers, they can't go dorsum in time and report a spontaneous abortion from months earlier.
If vaccine scientists either can't do this bones math — or are willfully deceiving the world with dishonest obfuscation of the numbers — and then "science" has already failed its core promise: to offer "prove-based" conclusions to empathize the world around us.
Yet when 4 out of 5 pregnant women lose their babies in the beginning xx weeks, these scientists falsely claim the spontaneous abortion rate is only 12.vi%. Why? Because they're covering upwardly the atrocities of the vaccine for political reasons, most likely.
In fact, the key author of the study, Tom T. Shimabukuro, is besides named in numerous other studies that claim to document agin reactions in various vaccines, ranging from rotavirus vaccines to the H1N1 vaccine from 2009. It raises the obvious question: Did Shimabukuro make the same fault in other studies that concluded vaccines posed no significant run a risk of adverse events? For example, here's some other report he co-authored: "Adverse events later Fluzone ® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Result Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013."
That study ended, "Review of VAERS reports did not place whatever new or unexpected safety concerns after TIV-ID."
Merely is that decision based on bad math, like the study on covid vaccines given to pregnant women? We phone call for a review of all his methods and conclusions. Mayhap this same study architect has made the aforementioned systematic error (or peradventure a deliberate obfuscation) for many years, spanning many previous studies. It wouldn't be the first time 1 author was found to have made systematic mistakes across dozens of papers and is forced to retract them.
And isn't that what the "scientific method" demands? Peer review. Double checking the math. Admitting to mistakes in conclusions. This is how scientific discipline progresses, by pointing out errors and demanding they be addressed and corrected. We can't but take bad math and call it "science" when the bad math doesn't bank check out.
Spike protein injections into pregnant women an "atrocity," warns Dr. Peter McCullough
In the mean time, it's articulate that four out of v pregnancies are being terminated by covid vaccines when those vaccines are given during the first 20 weeks (at to the lowest degree, according to the modest data set we have so far). And that means the "depopulation" aspects of the covid vaccine are working exactly as globalists hoped they would.
Remember: Bio-distribution studies (pharmacokinetics) show that covid vaccine spike proteins directly attack reproductive organs such every bit the ovaries. Given that spike proteins are engineered biological weapons designed to interfere with human cells, information technology should exist no surprise whatever that they are achieving a high rate of spontaneous abortions in pregnant women.
I recently interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough, an internal medicine proficient and editor of two medical journals. Although he does not narrate this as a depopulation agenda, he agrees that these vaccines are attacking pregnant women and causing more than than 80% of unborn babies to exist aborted. He calls it an "atrocity" and says the pushing of these vaccines on pregnant women is "shameful." Y'all tin hear him in his ain words in the following interview:
Brighteon.com/fc2aa0fe-eae0-4c32-bc23-47e6b6ab9d97
All this ways that live births may plummet by 3.2 meg over the next year, in the USA lone, if every meaning woman is vaccinated during the offset 20 weeks of pregnancy. The number of unborn babies being murdered in the womb, in this case, is reaching "holocaust" levels, which is why this is being called a medical "barbarism."
The fields of medicine and science accept turned against humanity. They are now killing babies by the millions and injecting adults with spike protein bioweapons that are causing strokes, heart attacks, deaths and lifelong injury.
The vaccine industry is at war with the human race. And live-born babies are their enemy. Joe Biden's state management czar once characterized man children as an "ecology risk."
This is a war. A bioweapons attack. And information technology goes beyond mere "crimes against humanity." It is a spiritual betrayal of the entire homo race by the institutions of scientific discipline and medicine, both of which long pretended to be motivated by a desire to assistance humanity, but are now clearly shown to exist working towards humanity's destruction.
Learn more than in today's mind-opening Situation Update podcast:
Brighteon.com/89677c54-51e3-4139-9af1-093fe160a3a1
Hear a new podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Source: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-01-depopulation-alert-shocking-new-study-reveals-covid-vaccine-terminates-4-out-of-5-pregnancies-via-spontaneous-abortions.html
0 Response to "Is Bayleigh on Bb20 Pregnant Again"
Post a Comment